Friday, January 2, 2015

CONSPIRACY THEORY: Why I Remain a 9-11 "Truther"

On  9-11,  my  Dad  called  me  shortly  after  the  first  plane  struck  and  said,  "Pete,  turn  on  your  TV !  Watch  what  is  happening  to  the  World  Trade  Center !"

So,  I  turned  on  the  TV  and  watched  the  planes  hit  the  towers.    I  looked  at  the  Pentagon  damage.    I  studied  the  matter  of  the  plane  slamming  into  the  ground  in  Pennsylvania.  The  first  thing  that  caught  my  attention,  as  I  grew  increasingly  depressed  as  the  day  wore  on,    was  how,  though  each  of  the  World  Trade  Center  towers  was  hit  on  the  side,   and  though,  in  each  case,  the  steady  streams  of  fire  and  smoke  came  out  of  one  side,  each  building  fell  down  into  its  footprint.

I  thought,   "Huh !!!   Two  cases  where  a  big  building  was  injured  on  the  side.  Two  really  good  chances  for   a  building  injured  on  the  side  to  collapse  toward  the  injured  side  after  uneven   burning   and  melting.

"And  yet,  neither  building  fell  to  the  side.    Both  buildings  fell  down  into  their  footprint!

"And,  in  each  case,    the  collapse  and  aftermath  bore  substantial  resemblance  to  a  controlled  demolition!"

But  that  is  not  the  reason  why  I  am  a  9-11  "Truther."  That  is  only  the  first  thing  which  caught  my  attention  and  made  me  a  little  bit  suspicious.

The  reason  why  I  became  a  "Truther"   is  because  after  the  twin  towers  fell,    I  began  surfing  the  channels  to  see  what  the  rest  of  the  world  was  seeing  and  saying  in  response,  and  I  caught  this ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI

As  I  watched,  I  thought,   "Wait  a  second !  I've  been  watching  coverage  all  morning !    As  far  as  I  can  tell,  that  is  Building  #7,  the  Salomon  Brothers  Building,   peeking  out  from  the  right  hand  side  of  Jane  Stanley's  head !    Why  is  she  saying  that  it  'collapsed'???!!!    It  hasn't  'collapsed' !!!     We  are  looking  at  it !  Live !  All  she  has  to  do  is  turn  around,  and  she  will  see  it !"

And  then  someone  pulled  the  plug  on  the  report,  in  the  middle  of  the  report.

And  then,  about  20  minutes  later,  what  did  the  world  see ?

The  world  saw  Building  #7,  the  Salomon  Brothers  Building,  collapse  for  no  good  reason,  but  not   in  a  fashion   which  "substantially  resembled"  a  controlled  demolition.

It  fell  precisely  like  a  controlled  demolition ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnLcUxV1dPo

Now,  World  Trade  Center  7  wasn't  just  any  New  York  skyscraper.     It  was  the  one  skyscraper   which   was  specially  hardened  against  collapse.  In  effect,  it  was  one  of  the  world's  toughest,  un-collapsible   buildings.  New  York  authorities  had  wanted  to  put  their  emergency  management  center  there,  for  that  reason.

  And  though  a  floor  was  burning   about  a  third  of  the  way  up,   on  one  side,    this  building,  too,    fell  in  perfect  order,   straight  down,  into  its  own  footprint.

So,  I  don't  care  what  anyone  says.

Even  if  "they"  pay  the  world's  most  expensive  engineer  to  go  on  television  and  say,  "Well,  the  reason  why Building  7  fell  is  that  fire  heated   the  salagadoola  which  was  attached  to  the  mechika  boola,  and,  you  know,   that  impacted  the  phased  system  actuator  which  caused  rapid  frequency  harmonics  in  the  steel  superstructure  so  that  a  rapid  energy  singularity   caused  the  thing  to  collapse  from  the  basement  up,  and  --  bippity  boppity  boo !   --   it  fell !,"  don't  believe  it !  Don't  believe  it !

Think:   Why  did  BBC  (and  CNN,  also),  before  Building  7  fell,   say that  Building  7  fell ?

Because  it  was  already  set-up  for  controlled  demolition  with  explosives,  and  whoever   was  orchestrating  Building  7's  demolition  screwed-up  the  timing  of  their   news  release.

And  why  did  BBC  suddenly  lose  its  live  coverage  of  the  Building  7  collapse?

Because  whoever  was  orchestrating  the  whole  fraudulent  thing   was  watching  BBC,  realized  that   that  was  Building  7  in  the  background,  peeking  out  from  behind  the  BBC  reporter's  head,  and  realized,  "Holy  crap !    We  issued  the  news  release  too  early !    Quick !  Cut  off  BBC !"

Now,  think  a  little  more:    Those  things  could  not  have  happened  to  Building  7  unless  "they"   knew  that  the  twin  towers  were  going  to  be  attacked  and  caused  to  fall.

So,   "they"  knew  that  the  twin  towers  were  going  to  be  attacked,  but  they  did  nothing  to  stop  it;    they  collected  on  the  insurance;    and  whatever  they  wanted  destroyed   in  Building  7  was  destroyed.


No comments:

Post a Comment