At this point -- at this point -- I would still let my newborn receive his "shots" vaccinating him against this disease and that disease.
Let me repeat that: At this point I would still let my newborn receive his "shots" vaccinating him against this disease and that disease.
Let me repeat that again: At this point I would still let my newborn receive his "shots" vaccinating him against this disease and that disease.
Let me repeat that again: At this point I would still let my newborn receive his "shots" vaccinating him against this disease and that disease.
Let me repeat that again: At this point I would still let my newborn receive his "shots" vaccinating him against this disease and that disease.
LET ME REPEAT THAT AGAIN: AT THIS POINT, I WOULD STILL LET MY NEWBORN RECEIVE HIS "SHOTS" VACCINATING HIM AGAINST THIS DISEASE AND THAT DISEASE.
The reason why I keep repeating that line again and again and again is because of one of the games liberals play when lying liberals lie: They radicalize what the thinking conservative is saying, when they lyingly "play-back" what he has said, and so they portray him as a simple-minded buffoon jumping up-and-down like a monkey on LSD saying crazy black-hearted nonsense.
Having tried to avert lying liberal nonsense, let me proceed to the subject at hand: ARE VACCINE OPPONENTS A BUNCH OF CRAZIES, OR DO THEY HAVE A POINT?
Suppose I were to invite a group of parents to bring their infant children into a vaccine manufacturing facility and I stand in front of a cauldron and I were to say out loud, into a microphone, as the parents who love their babies watched and listened, "Okay, guys in the warehouse, I want the pharmaceutical operators who make the DTaP vaccine -- the Diphtheria/Tetanus/Pertussis shot -- to stand ready.
"First, bring me a cup of uncooked, undigested cow heart;
then, a cup of aluminum sulfate;
then, a cup of aluminum phosphate;
then, a cup of formaldehyde;
then, a cup of polysorbate 80 soap surfactant;
then, a teaspoon of organic mercury;
then, a cup of uncooked African green monkey kidney; then, the uncooked human lung tissue of that boy aborted in England in 1966."
This is not a joke. This REALLY IS the stuff put into that liquid containing the weakened microorganisms which immunize.
Let me say that in a special way, so that the folks here don't miss the point ...
THOSE
REALLY
ARE
THE
SUBSTANCES
WHICH
THE
DOCTOR
INJECTS
INTO
YOUR
BABY'S
BLOODSTREAM.
While I carefully stir these ingredients into the water in the cauldron, the parents of the newborns are asked to put their babies on a row of gurneys.
Then, at the end of the row of babies on gurneys, members of Congress, and the President of the United States, all of whom watched me mix this stuff into the water in the cauldron, are made to stand in line.
I then take a syringe, stick it into the mix, suck-up a quarter of a syringe full of the uncooked meat/metal/preservative/surfactant soup, and walk up to the President and say, "Pull up your sleeve."
The President says, "NO, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO PUT THAT UNDIGESTED FOOD AND POISON DIRECTLY INTO MY BLOODSTREAM!"
Then a group of other technicians plunge their syringes into the goo, and run up to members of Congress and say, "Pull up your sleeve."
They reel back defensively and say, "NO, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO PUT THAT UNDIGESTED FOOD AND POISON DIRECTLY INTO MY BLOODSTREAM!"
Then the technicians run over to the babies on the gurneys and turn them over to stick the needles into their butts, but the parents object.
A bunch of other technicians run into the room and point firearms at the parents to make them stand back while uncooked, undigested cow heart; aluminum sulfate; aluminum phosphate; formaldehyde; polysorbate 80 soap surfactant; organic mercury; uncooked African green monkey kidney; and the uncooked human lung tissue of that boy aborted in England in 1966 are injected into their babies' behinds.
The parents look to the President and to members of Congress and say, "THESE GUYS WANT OUR NEWBORNS' BLOODSTREAM DIRECTLY INJECTED WITH THIS UNDIGESTED FOOD JUNK AND POISON AT GUNPOINT! THEY DON'T EVEN GET TO SWALLOW IT SO AT LEAST THE UNDIGESTED FOOD IS DIGESTED BEFORE IT GOES INTO THEIR BLOOD!"
The technicians tell the President and Congress, "Well, when you folks say that you want parents to be 'legally required' to have their children immunized, ISN'T THIS EXACTLY WHAT SUCH A LAW WOULD MEAN, IN ESSENCE?"
As far as I can tell, yes.
So, vaccine opponents aren't crazy. They do have a point.
One more comment: The same people who want immunizations made mandatory produced the famous "nuclear weapons are safe" film in 1957:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.npr.org/blogs/krulwich/2012/07/16/156851175/five-men-agree-to-stand-directly-under-an-exploding-nuclear-bomb
Put it another way: Would you stand in line for a nice syringe full of ground-up cow guts, ground-up monkey guts, ground-up human guts, aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, soap surfactant and water?
ReplyDeleteSuppose they put up a large sign with large print in every doctor's office saying, "The shor which your baby is about to receive directly into his bloodstream, so that some of it will flow directly into his brain, contains uncooked, undigested cow heart; aluminum sulfate; aluminum phosphate; formaldehyde; polysorbate 80 soap surfactant; organic mercury; uncooked African green monkey kidney; and the uncooked human lung tissue of that boy aborted in England in 1966."
ReplyDeleteI wonder what the effect of the sign would be, nationwide.